One 45-minute working session. A finished, one-page AI use policy in your hands within 48 hours. Not a governance binder nobody reads — a single page your annual fund manager will actually follow, built around what your team is already doing.
Need an invoice instead of paying by card? Email me for an invoice.
Somewhere in your organization, someone is pasting donor information into a public AI tool right now. A draft appeal. Meeting notes. A major gifts memo with a longtime supporter's giving history and the details that make the relationship work.
She isn't being careless. She's being resourceful with the only thing she was handed. The AI mandate landed on her desk with no budget, nothing taken off her plate, and no guidance about what was and wasn't allowed.
That donor file now sits in a system your organization doesn't control, under no policy, because the organization never decided anything about AI at all.
The fix is not a ban. Bans push the practice underground, which is usually how it got this far in the first place. The fix is one page that says what's allowed, what never gets pasted into a public tool, and who to ask when you're not sure.
Policy templates fail because they're written for a generic organization that doesn't exist. This one gets written for the tools your team actually uses, the data you actually hold, and the approval structure you actually have.
A handful of questions about your CRM, your team size, what AI tools people have already touched, and where your donor data lives. Five minutes to complete. It means the session opens at substance instead of at introductions.
We work through the twelve decisions that have to be made by a human — two in each of the six sections, from which uses are pre-approved to what donor data never enters a tool you don't control. You make the calls. I ask the questions that surface what you haven't considered.
A formatted, one-page internal AI use policy in your organization's language, reflecting the decisions you made in the session. Delivered as an editable document — yours to adapt, circulate, and put in front of your board or your staff without another round of work.
What AI is cleared for, named specifically enough that nobody has to guess — so the policy reads as an enabler, not a warning label.
The donor data that never enters a tool your organization doesn't have an agreement with: names, giving histories, personal circumstances, and whatever else your team decides is absolute.
What your donors get told about AI in your communications, and when — where your line sits between AI helping draft something and AI being the relationship.
What a named person has to read before it reaches a donor, a funder, or the public — and your do-not-automate list: grief acknowledgments, personal loss references, final solicitation calls.
One named person to ask before anyone pastes, and a clear rule that asking is never held against you — because the organizations getting this right are the ones whose staff aren't hiding anything.
A named owner, a review date, and a trigger list, so the policy stays current as tools change instead of quietly going stale in a shared drive.
Two decisions live inside every section — twelve in all. They depend on your tools, your donors, and what your board will actually approve, which is why the session exists: you make the calls, the policy gets written around them.
Most organizations that set out to write an AI policy don't finish one. The project gets scoped as a governance initiative, lands on a committee, and stalls — while staff keep using the tools in the meantime with no guidance at all.
A forty-page governance binder protects nobody if the annual fund manager never opens it. One page she reads and remembers protects your donors, your staff, and your organization considerably better.
This is the version that gets finished. It's meant to be the floor, not the ceiling — and for most development shops, the floor is exactly what's missing.
Not sure which one you need? Book a free 20-minute conversation and we'll figure it out together.
Direct answers, including the ones that might talk you out of it.
🔒 Payment is collected securely when you book · Confidential · The policy is yours to keep and adapt
Need an invoice instead of paying by card? Email tara@quarriedevelopmentgroup.com and I'll send one.
If the real question isn't "what are our rules" but "where does AI actually belong in our fundraising operation," the TRUST Audit™ is the right starting point — a full diagnostic with five ranked opportunities and a 90-day roadmap, delivered in three business days.
Explore the TRUST Audit™ — $2,500 →